Using Jev as a routing layer cuts an 8-hour day to 48 minutes
In a multi-model pipeline test, Jev only returns a choice, score or yes/no, costs 22 times less than Opus 5, and passes about 1 in 4 uncertain cases to Opus.
OPUS 5.5 + SONNET 5.5 + GPT-6 ASTRA + JEV + DOTS on one spider, and my 8-hour day took 48 minutes... the run is a demo. the prices are real. the cheapest agent on that web is Jev. it only answers with a choice, a score, or a yes/no. 22 times cheaper than Anthropic's Opus 5, 13 times faster, only 3 points less accurate. it cannot write a single sentence. the startup is TypeSafe. the CEO, Diogo Almeida, co-wrote InstructGPT at OpenAI, the paper that taught GPT to follow instructions. now he builds a model that never talks. OpenRouter tested it on 3,080 banking support questions. Jev: 81.0% right, 175 ms. Opus 5: 84.4% right, 2,266 ms. full run: $0.34 vs $7.44. Opus 5.5 was not in the test. then the smart part. Jev answers when it is sure. about 1 in 4 goes to Opus. result: 84.0% accurate for $0.69 per 1,000 questions instead of $2.42. that is my spider. OpenAI's Dots reads 4,860 items. Jev decides what matters. 1 hard case goes to Opus 5.5. Sonnet 5.5 writes 14 files. GPT-6 Astra ships it. most of your day is not work. it is sorting. most people who say they have no time are reading 4,860 things that never needed them.
This post quotes another post: x.com/noisyb0y1/status/2105964235087856080