WHAT NEW IN X10.31 SAT

AI collections from X · 22 collections · 63,169 posts

jevVIDEO

Jev analyzes 100,000 viral X posts in 20.4 seconds for $0.67

The author built a viral post analyzer that runs 14 yes/no checks with confidence scores per post, processing 100,000 posts in 20.4 seconds for $0.67 and comparing hook types against viral rates.

Movez
@0xMovezArchived 2026.09.20Originally posted 2026.09.19
Movez @0xMovezOriginally posted 2026.09.19
Open original on X

I just built a Jev X Viral Post Analyser. 100,000 viral X posts. 20.4 seconds. $0.67. Claude Opus 5, same corpus, same clock, got through 214 posts and spent $0.98. per post that is ~680x cheaper the full Opus pass would have run $458. viral analysis is the perfect Jev job. • it is not writing, it is 14 yes/no calls per post: > does the hook open a loop, > is there a number in the first line, > is the proof real or claimed. classification, not prose. • what it found: 1,220 posts broke into the top 1%. baseline 1.22%. > superlative claim - 2.34% viral. 1.92x baseline > contrarian take - 1.59%. 1.31x > launch / tool drop - 1.46%. 1.19x and numbered lists, the thing everyone writes: 0.55%. below baseline. the most used hook is the least viral one. full stop. • what you are watching: left is the post under analysis, right is Jev answering 14 typed questions about it, each with a confidence score. the run stops at 20.4s because that is when Jev finished all 100k. pulled the corpus through a few X APIs, one parallel pass into Jev. should I drop it to public? Read my latest article on Jev Engineering below and turn your ideas into reality.

This post quotes another post: x.com/0xmovez/status/2101007482919227841

x.com/0xmovez/status/2101325703635435523Archived 2026.09.20 10:10