Trading bot uses Jev as a typed decision gate
Opus 5.5 only handles the debate, while Jev's typed decisions and a p−ε≥τ confidence formula decide whether a setup is worth a look and clears the gate; 6 of 8 trades were refused and all refusals were right.
this f*cking spider refused 6 of my 8 trades last night and it was right every time I gave Opus 5.5 a trading desk and took away one thing: the right to decide the LLM only does what needs words. everything else is a typed decision: > worth a look? Jev says yes or no before a single token is spent > the case: Opus 5.5 argues for, a second Opus 5.5 argues against > size it: half Kelly, capped at 2%, plain code, no model touches it > clear the gate? one line, no vibes: p - ε ≥ τ p is how sure the desk is. ε is how overconfident it has been on this exact setup before. τ is the bar, 0.60 > NVDA breakout: 0.70 - 0.12 = 0.58. refused > ETH mean reversion: 0.68 - 0.04 = 0.64. taken > every refusal gets logged with a reason, and that log feeds ε back into the gate the gate is the whole point Robinhood's agents make ~30M tool calls a day. not one of them has to clear a published confidence bar my desk spent $0.43 on debates last night. the gate costs nothing. it's code most AI trading bots ask how sure the model is. mine asks how often it was wrong when it felt this sure
This post quotes another post: x.com/n01ennn/status/2103542021071978601