deepseek-v4.1POST
User argues Artificial Analysis underrates DeepSeek 1017
A user contends DeepSeek 1017's score of 45 undersells it, since it sometimes beats K3.1's 55, and both belong in a higher tier.
Beamsters
@Beamsters1Archived 6 days agoOriginally posted 2026.10.25
Beamsters @Beamsters1Originally posted 2026.10.25
I think at this point Artificial Analysis should improve how it determines intelligent score. Deepseek 1017's 45 is much closer to the frontier and sometimes even beat K3.1's 55. Both should be tier 1.5 breakaway from those mid packs that cluttered around 40-45.
x.com/beamsters1/status/2114182729915043890Archived 2026.10.25 12:01