Jev and Picsart compared: both do only the necessary step
The author argues Jev doesn't waste tokens on simple judgments and Picsart doesn't need a camera crew for one finished image, since both cut out unnecessary steps.
JEV and Picsart actually solve the same problem. Don't do more. Do only what is necessary. Jev doesn't waste tokens on elaborate responses when the program needs a simple solution: yes/no, a category, or a rating. Picsart does the same with visual content. Why do you need a camera, a film set, actors, and hours of editing if all you need is a finished shot? A girl dancing in an ordinary room. No camera involved. This video was created entirely in @Picsart using AI. And this is where Jev and Picsart intersect in the most interesting way. AI becomes more useful not when it generates more, but when it eliminates unnecessary steps. Jev shortens the path from data to decision. Picsart shortens the path from idea to finished visual. And if this trend continues, we will less and less often have to ask: "How much work does it take to do this?" Because AI will simply eliminate most of that work. All that will remain is the idea.
This post quotes another post: x.com/fluixoo/status/2101672915984888306