Gemini 4 Argon vs Claude Opus 5.5: Google's own benchmark table
A video breaks down Google's comparison table: Argon leads on long context and long workflows, Opus 5.5 is stronger on terminal agent tasks, and the $2/$10 pricing is introductory only.
𝗚𝗢𝗢𝗚𝗟𝗘’𝗦 𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗚𝗘𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗜 𝗕𝗘𝗔𝗧𝗦 𝗖𝗟𝗔𝗨𝗗𝗘 𝟲 𝗧𝗢 𝟰 𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗗 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗙𝗜𝗡𝗘 𝗣𝗥𝗜𝗡𝗧 𝗙𝗜𝗥𝗦𝗧 Gemini 4 Argon vs Claude Opus 5.5, Google’s own table: Argon wins: Vals Index 68.9 vs 67.0 AutomationBench 51.3 vs 42.5 DeepSWE 77.9 vs 74.2 GraphWalks at 1M tokens 84.2 vs 66.8 long video, lab tasks Opus wins: FrontierSWE 62.3 vs 55.0 Terminal-Bench 66.4 vs 57.4 PostTrainBench and Terminal science tasks so Argon is great at huge context and long workflows Opus still leads when an agent lives in the terminal [the part people will miss: $2/$10 is an intro price. Google says it goes to $4/$20 later and hasn’t said when] before you switch: almost every number above comes from Google, no one has reproduced them yet early testers say frontend and design are its weak spot run it on 5 of your real tasks, not on a leaderboard 6 to 4 is a headline your tasks are the real benchmark