deepseek-v4.1IMAGE

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-6.1 Sol Ultra on a 3D animation task: better look, ~90% cheaper

In a same-prompt train-on-a-figure-8 animation test by @SPAC89, DeepSeek's metallic train and glowing sky city beat GPT-6.1 Sol Ultra's low-poly look at similar time and ~90% lower cost, and was 85%+ cheaper and twice as fast as Gemini 4 Argon.

程序员端哥

@duange6099Archived 11 days agoOriginally posted 2026.10.18

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-6.1 Sol Ultra on a 3D animation task: better look, ~90% cheaper

程序员端哥 @duange6099Originally posted 2026.10.18

Open original on X

卧槽，同一个 3D 动画任务，便宜 90% 的模型交出的画面我反而更想要视频上半是 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017，下半是 GPT-6.1 Sol Ultra，都是一列火车在天上跑 8 字形轨道，DeepSeek 那版是金属质感列车加发光的浮空城，GPT 那版偏低多边形玩具风做这个实测的 @SPAC89 说，两边耗时差不多，DeepSeek 成本便宜了约 90%，另一组对比 Gemini 4 Argon，便宜 85% 以上，速度快一倍这还只是一个博主的测试，但对我们做网页 3D 和动效的人来说，成本这一项已经够香了

This post quotes another post: “Hands-on: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 nears Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 on web 3D and motion”

x.com/duange6099/status/2111631772714930497Archived 2026.10.18 16:26