Multi-agent expert review loop for Claude Code output
The author suggests spawning 3–5 Claude Code sub-agents that review drafts through real expert frameworks using another model such as ChatGPT or Grok, then letting Claude rebuild from the feedback.
there's a simple way to 100x your AI outputs and most people will never do it... agents like Claude Code can spawn sub-agents that run tasks at the same time most people use this for basic stuff the real play is having 3-5 sub-agents review Claude's work from completely different angles... using ANOTHER model (ChatGPT, Grok or anything really) but don't use fake "expert personas" you invented in a prompt, you need real frameworks from real people how to build these expert profiles: option 1: use someone so well-known their thinking is already in the training data > have a Karpathy-style agent tear your systems apart > build a profile based on Ogilvy's principles to roast your copywriting option 2: go deeper with Obsidian and Hermes / Grok bot > feed it an entire youtube channel from someone you trust > or their blog, their newsletter, their podcast transcripts > prompt it to extract an expert card with their frameworks, decision patterns, and principles now upload that material into your agent what happens next: Claude generates the first draft > sub-agent 1 reviews it through expert A's lens > sub-agent 2 stress-tests it with expert B's framework > sub-agent 3 catches what the others missed > all running at the same time Claude thinks through every piece of feedback and rebuilds you only see the final version... the one that survived 3-5 rounds of real scrutiny this is close from getting the absolute best output for a specific task