WHAT NEW IN X10.29 THU

AI collections from X · 22 collections · 58,925 posts

jevVIDEO

Opus 5.5's four breaking API changes and how Jev routes effort per turn

The post lists four API changes in Opus 5.5 that return 400 errors, such as always-on thinking and removed forced tool use, and says Jev routes effort per turn so the cache stays warm instead of costing 31% more.

Flandermaxx
@FlandermaxxArchived 2026.09.25Originally posted 2026.09.25
Flandermaxx @FlandermaxxOriginally posted 2026.09.25
Open original on X

Jev + Opus 5.5: Anthropic's new model outscores GPT-6 Astra by 8.5 points, and 4 quiet API changes will 400 your agent before it ships a single line fix these before you touch the model ID: step 1 → 66.4% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 vs GPT-6 Astra 57.9% and Opus 5 52.3%. +14.1 points in one release step 2 → $4 / $20 per 1M, down from $5 / $25. cache reads drop to $0.20. at default effort it beats Opus 5 at max effort for ~1/5 the cost step 3 → thinking is always on now. send thinking: disabled and the call fails with a 400. remove the field and control depth with effort step 4 → forced tool use is gone. tool_choice any or tool returns a 400. use auto and tell the model when the tool applies step 5 → rewriting history breaks thinking. edit system, tools or earlier messages and you get a 400. append new messages instead, or turn on drop_block step 6 → the old computer-use tool is rejected on the API and Google Cloud. swap computer_20251124 for computer_toolset_20260801 step 7 → hop Opus 5.5 → Sonnet 5 → Opus 5.5 and you pay 4.36 instead of 3.32. +31%, cold cache, and Sonnet can't read Opus's reasoning. Jev routes effort per turn instead, so the cache stays warm 4 breaking changes. 3 knobs. Jev turns them for you full breakdown in the article below ↓

This post quotes another post: “Long read: how to build a Jev-powered agent stack”

x.com/flandermaxx/status/2103192492526928337Archived 2026.09.25 10:08