deepseek-v4.1POST
DeepSeek 1017 beats Grok 4.7 on CursorBench at lower cost
The author says DeepSeek 1017 is cheaper and better than Grok 4.7 on the same CursorBench, and questions Cursor subscriptions that no longer include non-Grok models.
gary IH fung
@garyfungArchived 1 day agoOriginally posted 2026.10.27
gary IH fung @garyfungOriginally posted 2026.10.27
the mogging is complete on same CursorBench, Deepseek 1017 is cheaper better than @grok 4.7 how about Composer 3, finetuned on DS 1017 @cursor_ai ? Because this and the xAI/cursor subscription when it no longer includes usage of any non-grok models, makes no sense now
This post quotes another post: “DeepSeek V4.1 Flash in Cursor: $0.60–$0.98 per task on the CursorBench cost frontier”
x.com/garyfung/status/2114908237283934372Archived 2026.10.27 12:08