kling-4.0VIDEO
Kling 4.0 after days of testing: weak text-to-video, strong video-to-video, 2–4x cheaper than Seedance 2.5
The author's takeaways: Kling 4.0 is weak at text-to-video, better at image-to-video but below Seedance, excellent at video-to-video, Omni-reference works well, generations are slow, and it costs roughly 2–4x less than Seedance 2.5.
Gilles Guerraz
@gillesguerrazArchived 10 days agoOriginally posted 2026.10.18
Gilles Guerraz @gillesguerrazOriginally posted 2026.10.18
Spent a few days testing Kling 4.0. My takeaways: → Weak in text-to-video → Better in image-to-video, though not Seedance level → Excellent in video-to-video → Omni-reference works well → Generations are slow, you need patience → Costs roughly 2 to 4x less than Seedance 2.5 Test reel below 👇
x.com/gillesguerraz/status/2111566683915571426Archived 2026.10.18 15:18