Jev triage plus Grok bot writing: routing events before generating
Jev decides lane, urgency and evidence in parallel within 100ms, and only the draft lane reaches Grok bot for writing; across 200,000 events Jev costs $11.76 while writing reaches $240.
jev + grok bot is one of those setups that makes agent economics look obvious in hindsight. useful split isn’t “cheap model vs expensive model.” it’s deciding whether an event deserves generation at all. → jev answers lane, urgency and evidence in parallel in 100ms → code guards push low-confidence or missing-evidence cases to human review → ignore gets a 1% audit, log stays ledger-only, draft is the only lane that reaches grok bot → grok bot writes, never routes, while risky cases stay outside automation at 200,000 events, jev costs $11.76 while writing reaches $240. a 4% escalation rate is enough for generation to dominate spend. my takeaway: once decisions become cheap, attention becomes the budget. scaling means keeping writing rare instead of endlessly hunting for a cheaper writer.
This post quotes another post: x.com/gippp69/status/2103394701063737504