A seventh agent uses Jev to judge whether reply sections are bots
Claude analyzed 18,400 replies and found 64% were bots, so a reply-scoring agent was added to filter out shill-spammed coins before Jev makes any decision.
I MADE CLAUDE READ 18,400 REPLIES UNDER CRYPTO TWITTER CALLS. 64% WERE BOTS. THE SAME 212 ACCOUNTS REPLIED TO ALMOST EVERY CALL. +$7,410 BY SKIPPING THEM last week i showed 31 of 40 kols selling into their own calls. the replies kept bugging me "sending this" "dev is based" "this is the one" "early again ser" so i pulled every reply posted in the first 10 minutes under 112 calls and gave them to claude it found the pattern in an afternoon → 64% of first-minute replies came from accounts younger than 90 days → the median bot reply landed 38 seconds after the call → 212 accounts replied to more than half of all calls, across different kols → 147 of them had wallets that gmgn and bubblemaps link to the same funding source as the caller's cluster the replies weren't fans. they were the second half of the call. the tweet makes you look. the replies make you feel late so now a 7th agent reads the replies before jev decides anything → it scores every reply account: age, posting rhythm, who else it replies to, which wallet funded it → if more than 40% of first-minute replies come from the ring, the call is skipped, no matter how good the chart looks → if the replies are slow, messy and real, it lets the other 6 agents work 30 days. 112 calls. 61 skipped by the reply agent alone. 31 trades. +$7,410 the best calls had the worst replies. typos, questions, people asking "ca?" ten minutes late. real people are slow the fake ones are always first next time you see "sending this" 30 seconds after a call, check the account age what's the most obvious bot reply you've ever seen under a call?
This post quotes another post: x.com/hrundel75/status/2103764774127317363