Two-model trading architecture: Opus 5.5 researches, Jev gates orders
The author uses Opus 5.5 to write strategy code while Jev separately decides whether the current market state permits a trade, so the model proposing an idea cannot bypass the execution gate; the agent loop, decision boundaries and code are published.
most “AI trading agents” are just a prompt with permission to place orders. that’s the part i wanted to remove. i built a two-model trading architecture where Opus 5.5 researches and writes strategy code, while Jev makes a separate, constrained decision about whether the current market state actually permits a trade. one model can propose an idea. it cannot talk its way past the execution gate. i broke down the architecture, the agent loop, the decision boundaries, and the code behind it in this article. the interesting question isn’t “can AI find a trade?” it’s “who gets to say no?” the answer is below
This post quotes another post: x.com/lostinazeroy/status/2103786949580345507