Jev screens evidence first, Opus 5.5 checks flags: 120-competitor pricing research 4.4x faster
Four agents scraped pricing from 120 competitors, with Jev verifying claims against sources and flagging suspicious entries, running 4.4x faster and 3.9x cheaper than full Opus 5.5 review.
i thought the hard part was finding the prices until my agents checked the fine print i paired Jev with Anthropic’s Opus 5.5, gave four agents 120 competitors and woke up to a searchable pricing dashboard with the billing terms exposed one instruction: “compare their plans, limits and hidden charges, and show where each answer came from” → Scout found official pricing pages → Reader extracted prices and billing terms → Builder built the dashboard → Reviewer investigated flagged claims Opus 5.5 did the research and build. Jev checked claims against the supplied evidence and flagged entries for another pass one agent found a $19 monthly plan. the source actually said $19 per user, billed annually, with five seats minimum the corrected entry showed a $1,140 annual commitment across 120 competitors: > 96 complete profiles > 24 partial profiles with gaps marked > billing terms and source links included same brief, two workflows: → Opus 5.5 reviews every step: 6h 40m / $114.80 → Jev screens first, Opus 5.5 investigates flags: 1h 30m / $29.60 the same 96 complete profiles passed my review. about 4.4x faster and 3.9x cheaper, including every model call full workflow below ↓
This post quotes another post: x.com/mika_systems/status/2101686148338798610