gemini-4POST
Gemini 4 Argon vs Opus 5.5 on reproducing an exponential-time hypothesis proof
With the same prompt, Opus 5.5 took 23 minutes and 1% of weekly quota to reproduce the proof, while Gemini 4 Argon took about 9 minutes with a more concise core recursion but one wrong conclusion.
Aurora
@MingTian685474Archived 15 hours agoOriginally posted 2026.10.27
Aurora @MingTian685474Originally posted 2026.10.27
OpenAI 和 Anthropic 同一天宣布自家 AI 推翻了指数时间假设 Anthropic README 里说,把核心思路压成几行提示,Opus 5.5 就能重新推出证明 试了一下,Opus 5.5 耗时 23 分钟,消耗 1% 周额度做出来了,Gemini 4 Argon 用同一个提示词,核心递推证明对了,其中一步还比 Opus 5.5 简洁,而且就用了差不多 9 分钟,但是多了一个错误结论 不过 Anthropic 是在 OpenAI 发出后 5 小时才发布的,看起来应该是被迫发布了,而且实际上那所谓几行提示是把最难的构造都给了😂好像也不能据此看出什么问题
x.com/mingtian685474/status/2115003489726386680Archived 2026.10.28 10:02