Turning trading judgment into a reproducible decision loop with Jev
A trading bot workflow where the LLM develops the thesis, Jev picks from predefined answers with probabilities, code handles risk limits and orders, and ambiguous evidence goes to human review.
the trader everyone follows is trying to call the next move the builder nobody follows is automating the decisions between the chart and the order both are looking at order flow. one needs to stay at the screen. the other is turning parts of that work into software that's the opportunity hiding behind jev most conversations about ai trading start with the same question: can it find me a winning trade? a more useful starting point is the decision you keep making by hand does this sequence match the setup? has the evidence changed? continue, wait, or send it for review? those questions can become a repeatable loop our stack gives each part a specific job the llm researches and develops the trading thesis jev reads the current state and chooses from answers we defined in advance, with probabilities attached code calculates exposure, enforces the limits and handles permitted orders. exchange records confirm what actually filled unclear evidence goes to review. hard limits run independently of the model now each judgment has an input you can replay, an answer you can inspect, and an outcome you can check that's why jev belongs here: the software needs a decision it can branch on, and repeatedly generating an explanation adds work to that path start with one recurring judgment. define its possible answers. test the loop in paper mode save this before your next session the opportunity is hidden in the part of trading you still repeat by hand
This post quotes another post: x.com/thegreatest_sv/status/2102802378378621355