Splitting content publishing between Opus and Grok Bot
The author uses Opus for drafting and HTML review, while Grok Bot handles long-video transcription and Shorts thumbnails that Post Bridge can't, plus the scheduling workflow.
I use @postbridge_ from @jackfriks and I use Grok Bot. Caveats 1. Long from YouTube videos can’t be done with Post Bridge so Opus puts those into a folder and gives me the prompt to hand off to Grok Bot. Grok Bot will pick up that prompt and it grabs thumbnails and all of the info it needs from a text file that was written by Opus. 2. Post bridge also does not handle thumbnails for shorts on YouTube so the Grok Bot has an automated task to look at my recent shorts and upload the shorts thumbnail. This is important for YouTube as more shorts are being shown on this platform on the home page and a good thumbnail matters for discovery (on top of a good hook). Drafting I have Opus output an html file where I review the content. It includes copy for all platforms. There is different copy for each platform and I’ve refined this over the past two years. I had existing skills around this and I’m glad I did that. Scheduling Once I approve I then have a conversation in a new chat and invoke my skill again and it kicks off the orchestrator workflow for scheduling. This will look and compare what’s trending, news, etc based on feedback with my Bot on X and help schedule the posts.