DeepSeek open stack contrasted with Anthropic account bans
The poster lists DeepSeek's MIT/Apache-licensed weights and inference stack, contrasting OpenAI and Anthropic's subscriptions, shrinking limits, and unexplained account bans.
What the fuck are you even talking about? DeepSeek gave us a thousand times more than anyone else in this industry. The weights, under MIT. Their production inference engine, under Apache 2.0, this week. Their attention kernels, their MoE communication library, their FP8 matmul library, their own distributed file system. The papers that explain how all of it works. And the component that makes your own deployment behave exactly like their API. Now tell me what OpenAI and Anthropic gave us. A $500 a month subscription. Limits that keep shrinking. Usage that drains faster than your plan says, until someone admits it was a bug. Models people swear got nerfed a month after launch. And a wave of account bans where nobody even tells you why. Not 1 weight from Anthropic. Not 1 line of the code that serves ChatGPT. Yes, the training data is not public, so call it open weights if you want. I do. But you picked the 1 lab that opened more of its real stack than anyone, and called it a lie. Are you fucking out of your mind? You're the only one selling lies here.
This post quotes another post: x.com/alex_verem/status/2112801561063887286