Grok Bot trading score rewards consistency over frequency, user finds
A user found the ACS score rewards steady patterns rather than trade volume, since one bad paper trade dragged the average down for two days, so he now picks setups more carefully.
checked the ACS this morning expecting it to have moved more than it actually did. sitting around 810 now, up from where it was a few days ago, but slower than i expected given how much i've actually been running the Grok bot. turns out @agenticscredit's score doesn't reward activity, it rewards consistency. figured more trades would just stack points. instead one aggressive paper trade that went bad pulled the whole average down for two days straight, even after three clean ones came right after it. a single bad call sits in the blended number longer than it feels like it should. volume alone doesn't move the score, the ratio does. it's grading the pattern, not the count. kinda changes how i'm using the bot now tbh. stopped trying to run it more often and started being pickier about which setups it's even allowed to act on. still not near the $250K ceiling, not close honestly. but 810 feels like the first number that actually reflects discipline instead of just showing up. haven't touched the Polymarket side yet, that's probably next once this number stabilizes instead of swinging around every other trade. anyone else notice one bad trade sticking around in the ACS longer than a few good ones can offset it, or is that just how mine's behaving?