Kling 4.0 falls short of Seedance 2.5 in same transformation test, user says
On an identical transformation prompt, the author says Kling 4.0 cost more credits and looked less realistic while Seedance 2.5 nailed it.
⚠️ Seedance 2.5 vs Kling 4.0 - same transformation test, and Kling got crushed Made with Seedance 2.5 on @makeugc I am shocked and very angry. And now the question: - Is it an overrated model? - Maybe something is wrong with the prompt? - Is it perhaps better suited for other tasks? Kling 4.0: ❌ The model turned out to be more expensive in terms of generation credits, and the result did not satisfy me at all - the realism is worse Seedance 2.5: ✅ Did it 100% Parameters: 16:9 / 15 sec / 720p Same prompt and same reference, but different results
This post quotes another post: x.com/zentrixhq/status/2114635507564986757