User questions a leaderboard placing DeepSeek V4.1 Flash below Grok 4.7

A user criticizes a benchmark ranking that puts DeepSeek V4.1 Flash below Grok 4.7, calling the scores bad and suspecting paid influence.

Zach

@ZryMillerArchived 10 hours agoOriginally posted 2026.10.28

Zach @ZryMillerOriginally posted 2026.10.28

Open original on X

To expand on this. Fable 5.1 below the models it is below, tells you all you need to know. Additionally, Deepseek v4.1 Flash below Grok 4.7, are you joking? Benchmarks were already bad. This is some paid shill bullshit.

This post quotes another post: x.com/zrymiller/status/2115268619441676648

x.com/zrymiller/status/2115276797160096023Archived 2026.10.28 12:02

Open original on X