交易 bot 用 Jev 做类型化决策门
Opus 5.5 只负责辩论，是否值得看、是否过闸由 Jev 的类型化决策和 p−ε≥τ 置信度公式判定，8 笔交易拒了 6 笔且全对。
this f*cking spider refused 6 of my 8 trades last night and it was right every time I gave Opus 5.5 a trading desk and took away one thing: the right to decide the LLM only does what needs words. everything else is a typed decision: > worth a look? Jev says yes or no before a single token is spent > the case: Opus 5.5 argues for, a second Opus 5.5 argues against > size it: half Kelly, capped at 2%, plain code, no model touches it > clear the gate? one line, no vibes: p - ε ≥ τ p is how sure the desk is. ε is how overconfident it has been on this exact setup before. τ is the bar, 0.60 > NVDA breakout: 0.70 - 0.12 = 0.58. refused > ETH mean reversion: 0.68 - 0.04 = 0.64. taken > every refusal gets logged with a reason, and that log feeds ε back into the gate the gate is the whole point Robinhood's agents make ~30M tool calls a day. not one of them has to clear a published confidence bar my desk spent $0.43 on debates last night. the gate costs nothing. it's code most AI trading bots ask how sure the model is. mine asks how often it was wrong when it felt this sure
这条是引用着另一条写的：x.com/n01ennn/status/2103542021071978601