WHAT NEW IN X10.29 THU

X 上的 AI 合集档案 · 22 个合集 · 60,637 条

minimax-m3.1IMAGE

M3.1 Flash 跑分:Automation-Bench 62.8% 超 Opus 5.5,单任务成本远低

实测帖列 M3.1 Flash 成绩:Automation-Bench 62.8% 领先 Opus 5.5、BankerToolBench 76.2、OSWorld V2 61.7,并给出让 agent 跑三遍并算每次成本的提示词。

Superior
@andreysuperior8 天前收录原推发布于 2026.10.20
M3.1 Flash 跑分:Automation-Bench 62.8% 超 Opus 5.5,单任务成本远低(第 1 张,共 2 张)
M3.1 Flash 跑分:Automation-Bench 62.8% 超 Opus 5.5,单任务成本远低(第 2 张,共 2 张)
Superior @andreysuperior原推发布于 2026.10.20
在 X 上打开原推

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is bad news for every expensive model It’s the model that was secretly running as Space Bunny, and its agent results explain why so many people were already building with it 62.8% on automation-Bench, ahead of Opus 5.5 at a fraction of the cost per task, 76.2 on BankerToolBench for long multi-step tool chains and 61.7 on OSWorld V2 for real computer use That matches what I’ve seen building agents. The model is rarely what breaks first, the bill is. Long tool chains, retries and self-checks add up fast, and I used to cut steps just to keep a run affordable When every run costs this little you stop rationing and let the agent do the job properly: plan, retry, verify, run it again Send this prompt to M3.1 Flash (no usage cap on MiniMax Code right now) and it automates your most boring weekly task and shows what every run cost: “Take the task I repeat every week. Build an agent that does it end to end, run it three times, and show me the cost of each run with the math.” Now you know what your agent really costs, and you saw it yourself instead of trusting a pricing page... The full prompt and the chart are below, try it on your most annoying task tonight

这条是引用着另一条写的:x.com/minimax_ai/status/2112150867868541221

x.com/andreysuperior/status/2112553027898912867采集于 2026.10.21 12:04