WHAT NEW IN X10.28 WED

X 上的 AI 合集档案 · 22 个合集 · 58,924 条

jevVIDEO

用 Jev 式微分支纪律跑 300 agent 编译 Godot 模块

帖主演示 Kimi K3.1 的 300 并行 agent 编译流水线,并称 Jev 工程在同一层之下用 3120 个运行时微分支解决内存分配、批处理屏障与矩阵运算。

damkin
@damkina73 天前收录原推发布于 2026.10.24
damkin @damkina7原推发布于 2026.10.24
在 X 上打开原推

Holy sh*t, Moonshot just open-sourced the 300-agent compiler pipeline for Kimi K3.1 Pro The brutal reality: launching 300 agents on frontier APIs is burning $400/run just to drown in context rot One command, 48s, $0.04 burn: a full Godot engine module boots without guessing 6 deterministic files, 340 lines of verified GDScript. You ran one prompt and wrote zero boilerplate by hand Launch Kimi Code like this: kimi --model k3.1-pro "build dynamic ragdoll physics, GLSL compute shaders, and CAD collision mesh for Godot headless run" how the workload splits across the frontier architecture: → 300 parallel K3.1 Highspeed micro-agents swarm the project topology before a single file is committed → 100 agents trace ragdoll tick loops, 100 agents validate GLSL shaders, 100 agents verify parametric CAD meshes → Kimi K3.1 Highspeed writes isolated headless tests in an isolated Godot runner (fails: Red) → Kimi K3.1 Pro (2.8T MoE / 104B active) crafts the master AST glue to turn the build Green with zero state drift → 6 files land: scene graph definition, physics controller, verified shader pipeline, and a /benchmark pass the fatal mistake 95% of engineers make: spawning agent swarms through unstructured natural language chat a swarm communicating without strict JSON schemas is pure hallucination, and you end up debugging race conditions for weeks in this run, the parallel pass isolated 12 conflicting collision states and resolved them in memory before writing to disk the tooling pass wired the headless runner directly to the native engine harness instead of inventing mock physics Highspeed swarms · Pro orchestrates · Engine boots JEV engineering applies the exact same discipline one layer down: 3,120 runtime micro-forks (memory allocations, batch barriers, matrix ops) resolved in code at 0.98 sharpness, while ambiguous splits (0.54 on breaking API contracts) escalate directly to the human terminal instead of guessing the multi-model execution tree: > you paste one directive defining the target engine architecture > 300 K3.1 Highspeed subagents parse tick pipelines, mesh topology, and input vectors concurrently > each subagent yields strict AST telemetry abstracts, never conversational logs > the 1M-token context ingests all 300 telemetry traces in a single deterministic attention pass > Kimi K3.1 Pro synthesizes the minimal production code to pass the headless test suite > all breaking engine bindings block execution until explicit human confirmation > JEV deterministically clears memory micro-forks and surfaces only edge ambiguities feed this tree and prompt directly into Kimi Code ↓ "Build and verify this engine module for me: 1. First, swarm the specification with 300 parallel K3.1 Highspeed subagents: 100 map physics update loops, 100 validate shader compiles, 100 verify mesh coordinate integrity 2. Each subagent returns a concise JSON telemetry contract only, zero natural language filler 3. Ingest all 300 abstracts into the 1M-token context and compile an isolated headless runner test that asserts failure states deterministically 4. Once verified Red, deploy Kimi K3.1 Pro (2.8T MoE) to generate the minimal AST implementation to pass the test harness without touching unrelated subsystems 5. Halt and ask for confirmation before writing to disk. Display every file modification as a unified diff with memory footprint metrics. Zero commits without my explicit approval." bookmark this, you will execute it on every single large-scale engine build ↓

这条是引用着另一条写的:x.com/0xricker/status/2087163793558126997

x.com/damkina7/status/2113737965088481464采集于 2026.10.25 10:03