DaveShapi 谈常驻本地智能体,称 Google 靠 Argon 后来居上
作者比较 ChatGPT Dot、Grok Bot 等常驻智能体,并以 Google 凭 Argon 反超为例,说明文化比模型能力更难改。
I need to remind myself to not prematurely close the book on local, always-on agents. ChatGPT's Dot is pretty remarkable. It is intelligent and capable, but it has waaaaay too much goddamn Main Character Syndrome. Grok Bot, likewise, is just dimwitted. Neither of these are intractable problems. I mean, Grok being being low IQ might be intractable due to the beliefs at SpaceX about what constitutes "facts" and "rigor" and there's no amount of AI that can overcome an idiotic culture, but time will tell. I think that part of OpenAI's and Anthropic's moats is that they are both comfortable with (and explicitly want) to create something smarter than them. Google, too. SpaceX doesn't seem to actually want to create something smarter. Or, they are so backwards, that they are using their intelligence as the cap (which is not very high TBH). I'd love to be proven wrong, like how Google came from behind with Argon. But yeah, you can't fix bad culture and bad epistemics without a major shakeup of strategy, philosophy, and leadership. My "dream team" right now would be: 1) Gemini's lack of bias + friendliness + emotional intelligence 2) Grok's lack of ego 3) ChatGPT's epistemic rigor 4) Claude's sense of aesthetics Unfortunately, getting these guys to work together is like herding angry kittens on meth.