用 Opus 5.5 把逆向拆解流程做成 48 秒可视化视频

deezzex @deezzex原推发布于 2026.10.14

在 X 上打开原推

REA (Reverse Engineer Anything) is the MOST dangerous tool a vibe coder can use i am literally SHOCKED... REA can take any viral AI app you admire, tear it apart from the outside, and rebuild how it works as your own. Completely FREE. no source code. no leaks. just what the app does in public. i turned the whole process into one visualisation. watch a sealed app get scanned, cut open, taken apart piece by piece and rebuilt on a blueprint, in 48 seconds. (keep this one, you'll want it the next time an app blows up and you're wondering how) here is how it works: 1. OBSERVE: write down only what you can see. first screen, signup flow, how fast answers come back, what's behind the paywall, what every export carries. no assumptions. 2. GUESS: name every part you think is inside. a prompt layer, a model router, memory, a pricing gate, a share loop. each one is just a guess until you test it. 3. TEST: change one input and watch what changes. a hard prompt vs an easy one. a fresh account vs an old one. day 1 vs day 2. one change at a time. 4. MAP: keep only what the tests proved. watch the two wrong guesses crack and fall out. "they trained their own model" turns out to be an API call. "growth is paid ads" turns out to be a share link on every export. 5. REBUILD: Opus 5.5 turns the proven parts into a blueprint, then into code. onboarding hook, cheap/strong model routing, streaming so it feels instant, a paywall that hits right after the first "wow". 6. COMPARE: run your rebuild next to the original. when the two signals lock together, you've understood it. that's the green REBUILT stamp at the end. you don't copy the product. you copy how it works. i'm taking apart a different product every week. the next teardown is already on the bench. you probably know a builder who's still guessing how the big apps do it. this is the 48 seconds they need. so tell me honestly: which app have you been using for months without ever asking how it actually works?

这条是引用着另一条写的：x.com/tekari0/status/2109228819228065864