WHAT NEW IN X10.31 SAT

X 上的 AI 合集档案 · 22 个合集 · 61,986 条

gpt-imageIMAGE

健身题材提示词横评四款生图模型

作者用同一段健身写实提示词测试 GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst、Flare、Nano Banana Pro 和 Seedream 5.0 Pro,请网友评判。

Gadgetify
@Gdgtify2026.09.14收录原推发布于 2026.09.13
健身题材提示词横评四款生图模型(第 1 张,共 4 张)
健身题材提示词横评四款生图模型(第 2 张,共 4 张)
健身题材提示词横评四款生图模型(第 3 张,共 4 张)
健身题材提示词横评四款生图模型(第 4 张,共 4 张)
Gadgetify @Gdgtify原推发布于 2026.09.13
在 X 上打开原推

Just a fitness prompt I tested with GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst, GPT Image 2.5 Flare, Nano Banana Pro and Seedream 5.0 Pro. Which one do you think handled it better? Prompt: 2x2 grid, AI infers extreme fitness subjects: INPUT: $ SUBJECT ACTOR = infer_lifter($ SUBJECT) // mid-movement, strained EFFORT = infer_exertion($ SUBJECT) // sweat, vein, flushed skin, clenched jaw GEAR = infer_equipment($ SUBJECT) // rack, dumbbell, cable, chalk MIRROR = infer_gym_mirror($ SUBJECT) // smudged, fingerprinted, sticker corner LIGHT = infer_fluorescent($ SUBJECT) // flat overhead, greenish, unflattering MOTION = infer_rep_motion($ SUBJECT) // bar path blur, shaking FLAWS = infer_flaws($ SUBJECT) // motion smear, noise in shadows Φ = sweat_specular(LIGHT, EFFORT) // highlight sheen on skin Compose: candid gym capture or mirror shot, harsh fluorescent light, sweat and effort visible, motion blur on the moving load. Photoreal, 9:16 vertical.

x.com/gdgtify/status/2099049191838224642采集于 2026.09.14 19:45