把 2 万条事件先过 Jev 再决定要不要写
作者主张成本关键不在模型贵贱，而在哪些事件被允许变成文本：邮件、链上、GitHub 等先由 Jev 一次调用并行回答 lane/urgency/evidence，代码只把不确定性往上抬，2 万条事件总花费 $29.04，其中 Jev 仅 $0.84。
most agent stacks are tuning the wrong 3% of the bill. the useful split isn’t cheap model vs expensive model. it’s which events are even allowed to become text. → every source hits jev first: email, on-chain, github, telegram, mentions. the event is content, not instructions → 3 questions, 1 call, ~100ms, answered in parallel and blind to each other: lane, urgency, evidence → code only moves uncertainty up. confidence under 0.85, “now” on an ignore, a draft with missing evidence, a timeout, all of those go human. never down into ignore → ignore gets a 1% audit, log stays ledger-only, draft is the only lane that reaches grok bot, and nothing auto-sends. you approve 20,000 events lands at $29.04. jev is $0.84 of that. writing is $28.20. the 1% audit of the quiet lane is $4.20, and it is the most useful line on the receipt. 10× the sources and ask 5 questions instead of 3: jev moves to $11.76, writing to $240. of the extra spend, $216 is the writer. $42 buys a million decisions. after that the only number you control is the escalation rate. the router is a receipt. the writer is the bill.
这条是引用着另一条写的：x.com/issatheblows/status/2105650553304838201