两个提示词让 Astra、Opus 5.5 等 agent 自我反驳计划
分享两个提示词：让 agent 先站到资深工程师立场反驳自己的方案再评判，以及在写码前按已验证内容给每项任务打 1–10 置信度。
Your agent's plan is never its best plan. It's the one it thinks you'll like. If you're vibe coding with Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, or Grok Bot, steal these 2 prompts. After it gives you a plan: "Now argue the opposite. You're a senior engineer who thinks this plan is horribly wrong. What would you build instead? Don't build it yet, just write the full plan with counters to every point you believe is wrong. Then judge both honestly: which plan wins, and what from the counter should we keep?" Before it writes any code: "Rate your confidence 1 to 10 on each part of this plan's tasks, based on what you've actually verified in code, not assumed. Under an 8, tell me exactly what you'd need to know to increase confidence. Don't do anything yet, we're only mapping and investigating." Frontier models are trained to agree with you. Making them attack their own plan is the closest thing to a second opinion you'll get from the same model. Last week this confidence mapping process caught 13 gaps in a plan I almost let my agents run. Bookmark these for your next session.