用 Jev 给 Grok agent 做分类与路由
作者主张别拿 Grok 干「这封邮件是线索还是垃圾」这类窄决策,改由 Jev 返回 Choice/Score/概率,并对比了每百万输入 token 0.042 美元与 Grok 的 2 美元。
you're f*cking wasting Grok on the dumbest jobs in your agent. stop paying a frontier brain to sort the queue. Grok can research, write code and work through hard problems. then you call it again to answer "which folder does this belong in?" that's the mismatch Jev is built for. TypeSafe's decision model doesn't write essays. it takes context and returns a choice, a score or a yes/no probability. wire it into a Grok API workflow to handle narrow decisions like: › which specialist should get this request? › is this email a sales lead, support issue or spam? › does this document belong in the research shortlist? › is this retrieved passage relevant to the question? › does this ticket need human review? › which prepared action fits the current state? then look at the input pricing: Jev: $0.042 per million tokens. output is free. Grok 4.7: $2 per million input tokens. output is billed separately. 10,000 calls with 1,000 total input tokens each: $0.42 for Jev input versus $20 for Grok input at standard rates. that's arithmetic, not a benchmark or your total agent bill. Grok work, tools, retries and review still cost money. but it explains why "send everything to the smartest model" deserves a rethink. not because Jev is smarter than Grok. because choosing from six labels isn't the same job as researching a company or fixing unfamiliar code. the split: › Grok handles research, reasoning and writing. › Jev handles bounded classification, scoring and routing. › code checks the result and executes only permitted actions. now look at where that could fit: your inbox. your research feed. your support queue. your document search. the handoffs between agents. one cheap classifier before the expensive work, rather than another full reasoning call at every fork. the catch: a yes/no answer can still require hard reasoning. keep those cases with Grok. unclear routes need a fallback, not a forced guess. start with one low-risk queue. define the options, include review, then check routing errors and the whole bill. let Grok do the hard thinking. let Jev sort what reaches it. let code keep control.
这条是引用着另一条写的:x.com/kocer_eth/status/2106078938397286811