用户指控 Higgsfield 换名转售 Wan 3.0 与 Seedance 2.5
用户比对 Higgsfield API 文档的价格、分辨率与参考图上限，称 Genjutsu Lite 实为 Wan 3.0、Genjutsu 为 Seedance 2.5，且加价 20–30%。
What Higgsfield is doing should be illegal, you should not be allowed to scam normal unaware users like this. "Genjutsu Lite" is Wan 3.0. "Genjutsu" is Seedance 2.5. They rename other companies' models and sell them as their own. Here is every proof, from their own API docs -> Genjutsu Lite = Wan 3.0 • Pricing: 480p $0.05 / 720p $0.10 / 1080p $0.20 per sec • Out of 40+ models on their API, only ONE other has this exact pricing: Wan 3.0 • Resolutions: 480p / 720p / 1080p, same as Wan 3.0 • References: Lite takes 1 video + 8 images. Wan 3.0 takes 5 videos + 10 images. Lite is Wan 3.0 with a fixed prompt and settings locked -> Genjutsu = Seedance 2.5 • Reference images: Genjutsu takes up to 30. Seedance 2.5 takes exactly 30. Wan caps at 10 • Video length: Genjutsu takes 4–30s. Seedance 2.5 is exactly 4–30s • Price: $0.318 / $0.681 / $1.632 per sec, which is Seedance 2.5 video-edit pricing + ~20–30% markup -> It's not just Genjutsu • Cinema Studio 4.0: $0.2057 / $0.4623 per sec • Seedance 2.5: $0.2056 / $0.4622 per sec • That's Seedance 2.5 again • "3.5x cheaper" isn't a breakthrough. They swapped Seedance 2.5 for Wan 3.0, a cheaper model, and called it "Lite" • Real Wan is listed as alibaba/wan-3.0. The same model is sold as higgsfield/genjutsu-light • They never tell you what's underneath I have never seen such a big company being untruthful to their users outright like this.
这条是引用着另一条写的：「Higgsfield 推出 Genjutsu Lite：照片一键入热门视频」