Grok Bot 与 Meta Muse 双持使用对比

Mike P @mikepat711原推发布于 2026.09.10

在 X 上打开原推

UPDATE: I’ve been using Grok Bot and Meta Muse simultaneously since Muse came out this week. Here is a snapshot of my current thoughts: Where Grok Bot wins: Depth of intelligence ✅ Personalization ✅ Prebuilt 3rd party connectors ✅ Integration with Cursor Cloud agents ✅ Integration with local machine ✅ Where Muse wins: Speed of Model ✅ Lively UI ✅ Apple native app integration ✅ Document designs (pdf specifically) ✅ Better shopping/reservation experience ✅ Better writer ✅ Lower cost ✅ Where I stand with both: I am running my life through Grok Bot still. It is the single place where I can stand up all of my routines, because of local machine integration. I also prefer Grok Bot’s multi-agent setup. Muse forces a “chief of staff” method, but I prefer speaking with individual agents with clearly defined tasks for all of my main uses. I stood up some of my Grok Bot agents as side chats in Muse and did not like the experience. Also couldn’t stand them all up because of no local machine access. I am reaching for Muse over Grok Bot for one-off agentic tasks, shopping, reservations, etc. Last night, I re-did my Maine vacation plan through Muse. It was a much more enjoyable experience than Grok Bot. The model’s speed makes it much smoother to carry out tasks that require a lot of back-and-forth. Muse did a better job of finding activities, and booking them autonomously. It shops and books much faster than Grok Bot. After we booked some activities, I asked it to remake my itinerary PDF. It did a much better job of designing this document than Grok Bot. I think we’re probably going to see major improvements to all of Grok Bot’s shortcomings soon, because I don’t think they’re very difficult additions, just needs a better harness. P.S: No need to comment about how you’re above Meta products because of your theory that Zuck is stealing all of your data. I don’t give a shit.

这条是引用着另一条写的：x.com/taiigerblue/status/2098068200021745992