WHAT NEW IN X10.28 WED

X 上的 AI 合集档案 · 22 个合集 · 58,924 条

benchmarkIMAGE

Muse Wonder Full 基准:比 GPT-6 Astra 慢很多

VulcanBench 合并成绩显示 Muse Wonder Full 中等档最划算,但速度远慢于 Opus 5.5、GPT-6.1 Sol 和 GPT-6 Astra,作者更推荐前两者。

Morgan
@morganlinton10 天前收录原推发布于 2026.10.18
Muse Wonder Full 基准:比 GPT-6 Astra 慢很多(第 1 张,共 2 张)
Muse Wonder Full 基准:比 GPT-6 Astra 慢很多(第 2 张,共 2 张)
Morgan @morganlinton原推发布于 2026.10.18
在 X 上打开原推

Okay my Muse Wonder Full benchmark is now complete with @VulcanBench - busy weekend so might not get to put all the data and model cards together until next week. But I wanted to share a quick peek at the combined score and how it compares to other models. The TL;DR is, with Muse Wonder Full, Medium effort seems to be the sweet spot, but, you need to take tokens-per-task and cost-per-task into account when deciding what model to use. In the two tables below, first is combined accuracy score, second is time per task. Right now Muse Wonder Full is quite a bit slower than Opus 5.5, much slower than GPT-6.1 Sol, and way slower than GPT-6 Astra. Overall, based on what I'm seeing, I would use Opus 5.5 or GPT-6.1 Sol over Muse Full at this point. You'll get the same or better accuracy faster and cheaper. More to come in model cards and deeper analysis on the site, but it's the weekend and I'm hanging with family more than doing benchmarks so might be a day or two. You should do the same! 🖖

x.com/morganlinton/status/2111509070494450055采集于 2026.10.18 16:02