WHAT NEW IN X11.03 TUE

X 上的 AI 合集档案 · 22 个合集 · 65,663 条

jevIMAGE

Foreman:Codex 干活,Jev 在旁边打分监督

有人把 Jev 架在 Codex 之上做监督者,一次并行调用输出 9 个维度的校准概率,再由 Python 策略决定继续、终止、验证还是收工。

PolyBender
@p0lybender2026.10.03收录原推发布于 2026.10.02
Foreman:Codex 干活,Jev 在旁边打分监督
PolyBender @p0lybender原推发布于 2026.10.02
在 X 上打开原推

someone put Jev above Codex to watch it work. the problem with every coding agent today: the agent reasons, edits files, runs tests - and decides when it's done. that's the bug. a model that's stuck can't reliably tell you it's stuck. Foreman fixes this with two concurrent loops: Codex works. Jev watches. the worker never stops. Foreman independently scores 9 dimensions in one parallel Jev call: implementation_complete: .91 tests_sufficient: .34 worker_stuck: .02 needs_verification: .82 ready_to_finish: .21 9 calibrated probabilities. one request. 400ms. a deterministic Python policy reads those numbers and acts: CONTINUE / STOP_WORKER / VERIFY / FINISH / ESCALATE Jev assesses. Python decides. Codex executes. the thresholds that matter: worker_stuck hits 0.80 - worker terminated. needs_human hits 0.80 - autonomous work stops. ready_to_finish hits 0.85 - job complete. no frontier LLM judging if its own work is good enough. the builder is honest about it - this is an architectural experiment. false positives kill useful workers. Jev accuracy on this use case is unproven. but the architecture is the point.

这条是引用着另一条写的:x.com/p0lybender/status/2105657133702193458

x.com/p0lybender/status/2106032559624687737采集于 2026.10.03 10:05