Spark X2.6 4B 个人助理测试：开思考模式利弊参半

GooGZ AI @PaulGugAI原推发布于 2026.10.23

在 X 上打开原推

My thanks to @Tylerwtzhang from the @SparkLLM team who reached out with some advice about this. Specifically- Spark X2.6 4B is built to work better with thinking mode on. And, it is mostly improved. I re-baselined my personal agent testing (X2.5 vs X2.6, thinking off and on), and also comparing them to an incumbent (Qwen 3.5 4B). Some thoughts: - Reasoning improved some personal-admin capabilities, but it was not a consistent upgrade, and importantly, substantially increases waiting time (this is partially why my testing and interest in how good models are with thinking off, because it makes them much more responsive. - Enabling reasoning improved tool reliability for both Spark models and improved Qwen’s context handling and daily organization. Other outcomes regressed or failed to complete: Spark X2.5 introduced scope errors, while X2.6 entered a reasoning loop on the A1 agent-context test (@Tylerwtzhang I'll share more diagnosis about this offline if interested, will DM you). For a personal admin/assistant agent, the trade-off is therefore task-dependent: extra thinking sometimes delivers a better result, but it also brings longer waits and a completion failure with one case.

这条是引用着另一条写的：x.com/paulgugai/status/2113445300782166308