WHAT NEW IN X11.04 WED

X 上的 AI 合集档案 · 22 个合集 · 67,905 条

gpt-6POST

OpenAI 推出 Astra for Law 法律技能包

律师作者分析 Astra 法律版为何不会取代律师:仅限头部律所、幻觉无法根除、计费按价值而非工时。

Dallin Drescher
@SellersCounsel2026.09.19收录原推发布于 2026.09.18
Dallin Drescher @SellersCounsel原推发布于 2026.09.18
在 X 上打开原推

ICYMI, OpenAI launched Astra for Law yesterday, a set of legal-based skills designed with input from some of the top law firms in the country. Is this the end of the legal profession as we know it? Here’s why I’m betting no… 1. The product is currently offered only to select law firms. That is intentional. As soon as OpenAI markets this directly to consumers, they are exposing themselves to Unauthorized Practice of Law claims in almost every state. The liability is not worth it (especially for a company that’s already cash-flow negative). 2. AI hallucinations have admittedly decreased, but everyone seems to generally agree that they will never be eliminated entirely due to the way the models function. Legal work demands precision and accuracy. You can’t just be 90% sure on due diligence. The risk will justify additional cost of taking the time to manually verify things. 3. Fees can easily adjust for reduced time spent. At its core, every legal service is provided based on value to the client. Sure, there is an hourly rate. But the work is only done if the result is reasonably expected to justify the total cost. If AI makes the work take half as long (it’s not there yet, btw), has the value decreased? Most would argue no, the value has probably increased. Fee structures will likely change to adjust for less time spent on a matter, but that doesn’t mean there will be a massive change in the aggregate cost. 4. The true value of legal services has not changed. Mindless tasks have never been the true value of legal services. Sure, they need to be done, but clients could do most of them themselves even before AI. It’s the professional advice and guidance that justifies the value. That’s the reason people hire trusted advisors when tools like LegalZoom have been around for years. I’m excited to see what these tools continue to bring and think they will have a net positive on both attorney workflow and overall client satisfaction.

这条是引用着另一条写的:x.com/openai/status/2100679992720142459

x.com/sellerscounsel/status/2100915495830741051采集于 2026.09.19 10:30