WHAT NEW IN X11.04 WED

X 上的 AI 合集档案 · 22 个合集 · 67,905 条

gpt-6VIDEO

六个 Astra 智能体互相证伪的交易实验

作者让六个 GPT-6 Astra 智能体在下单前各自写出推翻自己的条件,12 晚把 900 美元模拟账户做到 7420 美元。

starmex
@starmexxx2026.09.19收录原推发布于 2026.09.18
starmex @starmexxx原推发布于 2026.09.18
在 X 上打开原推

MY $900 PAPER ACCOUNT IS AT $7,420 AFTER 12 NIGHTS BECAUSE EVERY ONE OF THE SIX GPT-6 ASTRA AGENTS HAS TO WRITE DOWN THE NUMBER THAT WOULD PROVE IT WRONG BEFORE A TRADE IS ALLOWED TO OPEN an agent that can never be wrong will happily talk you into anything. so before any setup reaches the account, all six of mine have to publish the exact condition that kills their own vote, and if that condition prints they get muted for the rest of the night: -> PROBE is wrong if the volume spike does not repeat within 4 candles -> PRISM is wrong if the buyer who paid up leaves the book within 90 seconds -> TALLY is wrong if the position reaches 6% of the account before the exit is armed -> HATCH is wrong if price trades through its exit twice without filling -> LEDGER is wrong if the same dead shape appears 3 times in one night -> WARDEN is wrong if the setups it vetoed would have paid more than the ones it let through in 12 nights the desk muted an agent 61 times. prism got muted 22 of those, which was ugly to read because prism is the agent i was proudest of when i wrote it. warden failed its own test twice, both on the same wednesday, and the desk traded that night with no veto at all. that was the only losing night of the run at minus $214. everything else compounded quietly, 5,140 setups looked at, 5,092 killed, 48 trades filled, and the account went from $900 to $7,420 without me touching a key. the six wrongness conditions are written out line by line in the article below, take those before you take the prompts.

这条是引用着另一条写的:x.com/starmexxx/status/2098293921994465300

x.com/starmexxx/status/2100914931046445494采集于 2026.09.19 10:16