Gemini 4 Argon 在 DeepSWE 领先 Claude Opus 5.5,终端任务落后
对比显示 Argon 在 DeepSWE 修真实代码 77.9% 胜 Opus 5.5 的 74.2%,但 Terminal-Bench 57.4% 落后 66.4%,且输出价仅为其一半。
Gemini beats Claude at coding. Claude beats Gemini at coding. Both are true. On DeepSWE, fixing real code, Gemini 4 Argon leads: 77.9% vs 74.2%. On Terminal-Bench, working in a terminal, Claude Opus 5.5 leads: 66.4% vs 57.4%. At operating a computer, GPT-6 Astra beats both. The part that never makes the headline: most of these scores come from the companies themselves. Every launch chart is made by someone selling the model. So “best AI” usually means “best at this test.” The bill is easier to read. Per million output tokens: GPT-6 Astra $50. Claude Opus 5.5 $20. Gemini 4 Argon $10, for now. Same “best” label. Up to 5x the bill.