四模型浏览器海湖场景对比：Gemini 4 Argon 仅花 0.22 美元但画面最差
Claude Opus 5.5、GPT-6.1 Sol、GPT-6 Astra 与 Gemini 4 Argon 同建浏览器海洋场景，Argon 成本 0.22 美元最低但视觉效果被评最差。
Did Claude Opus 5.5 just crush everyone again? Although GPT-6.1 Sol at $2.80 has something to say 🌊 Four models built a marine lagoon right in the browser: sharks, whales, rays, splashes, and whirlpools Visually, Claude Opus 5.5 is my favorite. The water, reefs, and shadows make it feel like real shallow water. But GPT-6.1 Sol did a great job for the price: simpler visuals at roughly one-fifth of the cost Gemini 4 Argon built its version for just 22 cents. But honestly, it looks terrible. The price is more impressive than the result GPT-6 Astra was the most expensive. Looking at the visuals alone, I wouldn’t have guessed API cost: Claude Opus 5.5 - $14.70 Gemini 4 Argon - $0.22 GPT-6.1 Sol - $2.80 GPT-6 Astra - $22.54 For visuals, I’m picking Claude Opus 5.5. For value, GPT-6.1 Sol. What exactly are we paying $22.54 for here?