交易 bot 双模型:Jev 提议、Opus 5.5 可否决
作者用 Jev 扫每根 K 线给出多空/不动,Opus 5.5 只在 Jev 说 yes 时写论点、止损和仓位,7 天里 Opus 否决 41 次净省 $1,374。
NUCLEAR SILOS NEED 2 KEYS TO LAUNCH. MY TRADING BOT NEEDS 2 AI MODELS TO OPEN A TRADE. IN 7 DAYS THE SECOND KEY SAID NO 41 TIMES AND SAVED ME $1,374. In a launch silo the 2 keys sit 12 feet apart, so one officer can't turn both. I built my bot the same way. Key 1 is Jev. It screens every candle in under half a second and answers long, short or none. It's the only model allowed to create an order. Key 2 is Opus 5.5. It sleeps until Jev says yes. Then it reads price, funding and the last 24 hours, and writes a thesis, a stop and a size. Or it turns its key the other way. Code sits above both. Max 4% per position, a daily stop at minus 2% and a kill switch no model can touch. 7 days on my desk. → Jev said yes 118 times. → Opus vetoed 41. → Code blocked 9 more on the caps. → 68 trades went through. Then I graded every veto 6 hours later. → 29 of the 41 would have lost money. That's $1,914 Opus kept in my account. → 12 would have won. That's $540 it cost me. → Net, the second key saved $1,374. Waking Opus 118 times cost $2.36 for the whole week. The veto paid for itself 582 times over. The brutal part. 12 wrong vetoes in a week is a lot. Opus is cautious, and some weeks that caution will cost more than it saves. That's why it can only refuse and never press buy. The trick is the order. The fast model proposes, the smart model can only say no, and code can stop both. Flip it, and you get a smart model that talks itself into every trade. The full prompt is in the first reply. Paste it into Claude Opus 5.5, and it builds the bot and runs it on paper for 7 days before a single real dollar moves. Would you give a second AI a veto over your trades, or are you a one-key degen? Tell me below. The live version runs 24/7 in the article I'm quoting ↓
这条是引用着另一条写的:x.com/vmrmax/status/2106598531146399758