Opus 5.5 与 GPT-6 Sol、Luna 同日发布对比
一张图对比 Anthropic Opus 5.5 与 Sol、Luna 的价格、上下文、AA 指数和每任务成本。
Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol & Luna — same day! Anthropic dropped Opus 5.5, while OpenAI released GPT-6 Sol and Luna. Opus 5.5: $4 / $20, AA Index 58 (#1), Terminal-Bench 66.4%, GDPval-AA 1846 Elo. Anthropic also promises less “Claude-style” fluff. Sol: $2 / $10, 1.05M context, AA 48. DeepSWE: 68.8% at $2.74/task. Luna: $0.10 / $0.50, AA 37. DeepSWE: 66.6% at just $0.22/task — almost the same score as Sol for 12x less. The catch with Opus: tokens are 20% cheaper, but usage is much higher — 119K tokens/task vs 73K for Opus 5 and 31K for Sol. CodeRabbit saw 40–60% more tokens on code reviews. On AA, Opus 5.5 medium vs Sol max: coding 52.5% vs 43.9%, documents +159 Elo for Opus, business processes roughly tied. Cost: $1.34 vs $1.06/task. Bottom line: #Opus 5.5 is currently the smartest model and 2.5x cheaper than Fable. Luna is the big story for high-volume classification and extraction: 10x cheaper than Haiku. Sol is the mid-range option for mass workloads. Sonnet 5.5 reportedly arrives in a couple of weeks. #ai #web3