Space Bunny（M3.1 Flash 匿名版）实测：跑分高但 OpenCode 里不如 GLM 5.3 Flas
作者实测 Space Bunny/M3.1 Flash：跑分亮眼（DeepSWE 74%），但 OpenCode 日常编程不如 GLM 5.3 Flash，输出啰嗦吃上下文，实现错误偏多，DeepSeek 更可靠；付费用户反馈好于免费用量。
i’ve been testing Space Bunny / MiniMax M3.1 Flash, and the benchmarks look better than the actual experience so far: 1. on paper it’s strong: 74% on DeepSWE, 62% on Automation-Bench and 91% on BabyVision. 2. in OpenCode, it still feels weaker than GLM 5.3 Flash to me on normal coding work. 3. the model is also pretty verbose. it burns through context faster than i expected, which makes the cheap API pricing look less impressive per task. 4. i’ve seen more implementation mistakes than i expected from a model with these benchmark scores. DeepSeek still feels more reliable for actually pushing code. 5. the interesting part is that subscription/API users seem more positive than people using the free endpoint. the model may be good. the free Space Bunny endpoint might not be showing its best version.
这条是引用着另一条写的：x.com/opencode/status/2112156205938626954