Jev + Claude 闭环：Jev 做路由与验收，Claude 只写 diff
把 Claude 夹在 Jev 的预检路由和后置校验之间：Jev 选分支与文件、跑 Score 验收、用 Noul 校验 diff，再按置信度决定自动合并或转人工。
Jev + Claude is the most reliable developer pairing I’ve tested so far Claude handles the heavy code generation, while Jev acts as the deterministic supervisor that stops it from hallucinating or bloating context Here is how to wire them together into a closed engineering loop: task prompt → Jev selects branch & files → Claude writes diff → Jev verifies output → safe merge step 1 → separate decision-making from execution: Claude is the builder; Jev makes every routing choice, tool selection, and safety check step 2 → pre-flight context pruning: instead of dumping your entire repository into Claude's context window, Jev runs a fast Choice check to isolate only the 2-3 files actually needed step 3 → define typed acceptance rubrics: replace vague prompt instructions with a Jev Score evaluation (clean compilation, zero breaking API changes, strict type adherence) step 4 → bounded generation: Claude receives only the pruned files and the strict acceptance contract, cutting token consumption by up to 75% step 5 → post-generation verification: before any code touches disk, Jev runs a Noul check to mathematically verify that the generated diff satisfies the original request step 6 → route by confidence: high-probability patches that pass all rubrics merge automatically; uncertain edge cases pause and request a human review step 7 → log decision receipts: record state hashes, Jev's confidence score, and Claude’s token usage into a local log so every agent action is 100% auditable giving a frontier LLM full autonomy leads to broken builds and massive API bills sandwiching Claude between Jev's pre-flight routing and post-generation verification turns a probabilistic chatbot into a predictable software engineer