OpenAI's silence on $200 plan usage draws criticism, Tibo reply called arrogant
A user suspects more token-efficient models such as GPT-6 Sol are coming, but criticizes OpenAI for not addressing $200 subscribers burning through usage in days.
I'm sure this means more token efficient models are coming, probably GPT-6 Sol. But Tibo's reply comes across as arrogant. People are paying $200/month, burning through their usage in a couple of days and openly complaining about it while OpenAI says nothing. Maybe acknowledge the problem before being smug about the solution? If this is even a solution. Tibo seems like a good guy and I love Codex, but read the room brother.
This post quotes another post: x.com/thsottiaux/status/2100649624860254629