The ideal personal agent is a six-vendor patchwork
The author maps a wishlist agent spec onto shipping products: Opus reasoning, Dots voice, Codex local computer use, Duet mobile, Grok Bot inline apps and webhooks, arguing no lab wants to be the integration layer.
This is f**king gold. Someone just posted the full spec sheet for the AI agent nobody has shipped yet, and every piece already exists in a different company. the dream list, decoded against what ships today: > Opus 5.5-level reasoning that never falls back to a weaker model = Anthropic > Dots-level real-time voice and tool use = OpenAI, shipped late September > Codex-level computer use on your local machine = OpenAI > Artifacts-quality decks, docs, design = Anthropic > Duet mobile UI = Anthropic, shipped October 22 > Inline mini-apps across email, Slack and more = xAI's Grok Bot > Webhooks on the agent = xAI's Grok Bot > Social access across every platform = still nobody That is six vendors in one wishlist. Opus for brains. Dots for voice. Codex for local computer use. Artifacts for output. Duet for mobile. Grok Bot for inline and webhooks. the reason this agent does not exist as one product: Nobody wants to be the integration layer. Every lab wants to own the full stack. Being the glue is the lowest-margin seat at the table and the fastest way to get replaced the quarter a frontier lab extends into your lane. the stitch that already works today, if you set it up: Claude Code with the right MCP servers glues most of this on desktop. Grok Bot handles the inbox and Slack side. Duet handles the mobile side. The seams are visible, but the pieces talk. the one thing on the list that no vendor has shipped: an agent that organizes its own work into channels, so a week of its output fits in one scroll. full breakdown of the stitch job is in the article below. the agent you want is a few MCP servers away from existing.