WHAT NEW IN X10.29 THU

X 上的 AI 合集档案 · 22 个合集 · 58,925 条

deepseek-v4.1POST

V4.1 Flash 发布:DeepSWE 77.0 超 Opus 5,但多项仍落后

梳理官方数据:DeepSWE v1.1 得 77.0,高于旧版 74.2、Opus 5 的 74.0 和 Sol 的 73.0;但 Opus 5 在 Humanity's Last Exam、Terminal-Bench 等仍领先。MIT 开源,API 价格不变,Search/Fetch API 每千次 $0.75。

Billy Lee
@billyozno10 天前收录原推发布于 2026.10.17
Billy Lee @billyozno原推发布于 2026.10.17
在 X 上打开原推

DeepSeek releases V4.1-Flash-1017, an open model it says beats Claude Opus 5 on one big coding test (benchmarks are DeepSeek's own) DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 went live today on DeepSeek's website, app and API, announced at 3:35 PM BKK. It's an upgrade to V4.1-Flash. DeepSeek says it scores higher on benchmarks, finishes tasks faster and gives shorter answers On the DeepSWE v1.1 coding benchmark, DeepSeek's own table shows 77.0, compared with 74.2 for the previous version, 74.0 for Claude Opus 5 and 73.0 for GPT-5.6 Sol It doesn't win everything: by DeepSeek's own numbers, Opus 5 still leads on Humanity's Last Exam, Terminal-Bench and two other coding benchmarks The weights are open under the MIT licence on Hugging Face and ModelScope API pricing is unchanged at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens at peak times, with half-price rates off-peak DeepSeek also opened its Search and Fetch APIs to all developers at $0.75 per 1,000 calls each ⚠️ The benchmark figures come from DeepSeek and haven't been independently tested yet. Would a cheap open model like this get you to switch from Claude or GPT for coding? 👇 #DeepSeek #AI #OpenSource #LLM #AIcoding

x.com/billyozno/status/2111395434929496379采集于 2026.10.18 16:45