成本对比：V4.1 Flash-1017 比 Opus 5.5 便宜 13–33 倍
输入 0.15–0.30 美元 vs Opus 5.5 的 4 美元、输出 0.60–1.20 美元 vs 40 美元每百万 token；同一复杂任务 Opus 约 6 美元、DeepSeek 约 0.27 美元。
Wtf, Deepseek v4.1 flash -1017 is dominating from Everyside Every model is getting cooked by Deepseek v4.1 -1017 , Mainly Deepseek is actually competing Anthropic's Opus 5.5 Opus 5.5 is the Goat model ever launched by Anthropic at very high price but when the topic is about choosing one model bettween opus 5.5 and Deepseek v4. 1 -1017 I would choose Deepseek v4.1-1017 as because Deepseek v4. 1 is 13x to 33x cheaper than opus 5.5:- input cost - Deepseek $0.15 to $0.30 per 1M tokens , while Opus 5.5 cost $4.00 Output cost- deepseek $0.60 to $1.20 per 1M tokens , while opus 5.5 cost $40 A complex task that cost around $ 6 on opus 5.5 and $ 0.27 on Deeseek v4.1 flash - 1017