Artificial Analysis 编程 Agent 指数：Codex+DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 每任
290 任务指数 v2.0 的成本前沿：Codex+DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 47.3 分/$0.39，GPT-6.1 Sol 54.1/$1.50，GPT-6 Astra 54.7/$7.04，Claude Code+Opus 5.5 61.7/$11.42。
Claude Code with Opus 5.5 tops the new Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, but the cost column is what I keep coming back to. Index v2.0 scores each model together with its agent harness across 290 tasks: software engineering, terminal use and repo Q&A. The four setups on its cost frontier: - Codex with DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 47.3 at $0.39 per task - Codex with GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.1 at $1.50 - Codex with GPT-6 Astra: 54.7 at $7.04 - Claude Code with Opus 5.5: 61.7 at $11.42 All at max effort, and these are pay-per-token API costs, not subscription prices. Claude Code is what I use every day, so the top score doesn't surprise me. What I find more useful is the spread. For routine tasks, a setup at a fraction of the cost may well be enough. Scores will keep moving, so I read any leaderboard as a snapshot, not a verdict.
这条是引用着另一条写的：「Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0：Claude Opus 5.5」