deepseek-v4.1VIDEO
同题 Blender 渲染对比：DeepSeek 官方平台 44 分钟 vs OpenCode Go 2 小时
同一提示词、同一 DSH harness、high 推理强度下，官方平台 212 tok/s、缓存命中 99.8%，OpenCode Go 170 tok/s、耗时 2h5m，作者问哪个效果更好。
Naz
@nothingto127 天前收录原推发布于 2026.10.24
Naz @nothingto12原推发布于 2026.10.24
🧵 ROUND 3: DeepSeek-v4.1-Flash-1017 - Same prompt, same harness (DSH), same reasoning effort (high), but two different providers. Time for a blender render this time! DeepSeek Platform (44m 50s): • Cache hit: 99.8% • Uncached input: 78,874 tok • Cached input: 32,812,416 tok • Output: 301,162 tok • Speed: 212 tok/s avg OpenCode Go (2h 5m 25s): • Cache hit: 99% • Uncached input: 276,498 tok • Cached input: 24,345,856 tok • Output: 185,155 tok • Speed: 170 tok/s avg What do you think did better?
这条是引用着另一条写的：「DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 同题双平台耗时与缓存对比」
x.com/nothingto12/status/2113766577816686673采集于 2026.10.24 12:07